Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  49 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

Global Trustee and Fiduciary Services News and Views

| Issue 48 | 2017

47

Enhanced disclosure

The FCA believes there is a risk that potential

liquidity issues are not, in their current form,

adequately disclosed to investors. While

information on potential liquidity issues and

how the manager can deal with such issues are

set out in the fund’s prospectus, in reality the

FCA is aware that not many investors request to

see the prospectus and some authorised fund

managers’ prospectuses are not easily available.

Annual and half-yearly reports are another

source of information, but such accounts may

be published months after the events that

caused concern.

The FCA is also concerned that presale

information for funds is not standardised (except

for UCITS). However, it is arguable that this will

be largely addressed through the introduction of

the PRIIP KIDs (at least for retail clients).

7

These

documents will require the liquidity risk to be

addressed in a specific section.

While there are good arguments for enhanced

disclosure on liquidity issues, it is also worth

remembering that investors should not be

unduly put off investing in longer-term funds.

Secondary market provision

The final suggestion made by the FCA in its paper

is whether more should be done to encourage a

secondary market as an alternative redemption

route, particularly during periods of stress.

However, under normal circumstances, it is usually

straightforward to deal through a manager,

and under stressed market conditions, it is not

likely that the secondary market would offer

significantly more liquidity while it would add to

the cost and administrative burden of dealing.

Conclusion and next steps

The DP and the PRP demonstrate the continuing

regulatory interest in liquidity across the

financial sector. The timing of the FSB’s PRP

and the FCA’s DP is helpful to the industry

insofar as the FCA is clearly asking for wide-

ranging input from the industry and allowing

for feedback on any points of concern arising

from both papers and wider global regulatory

trends (such as the developments in the US). In

particular, it may be worth considering whether

the recommendations for increasing amounts

of data (whether provided to the manager or

also available to the regulator) suggested by

the FSB is necessary or proportionate in the

UK and indeed the EU. The asset management

sector will be required to generate and share

significant amounts of additional data as a

result of MiFID II, and there is a strong argument

that regulators should make the best use of

the data they will have access to as a result of

such changes before considering whether to put

managers under further reporting obligations.

The FCA is expected to issue a response later

in the year, and it will be interesting to see the

extent to which the FCA takes on board the

industry feedback it receives. If the FCA does

consider amending its rules or guidance, it will

have to issue a consultation paper, which will be

another opportunity for industry input. IOSCO is

also due to have completed its liquidity review

and to have carried out the work requested

by the FSB by the end of 2017, so we should

expect a further paper on the topic. While many

asset managers will have dedicated significant

resources to high-profile regulatory projects such

as MiFID II and PRIIPs, time will also be required

for any changes to liquidity risk-management

policy that may require implementing.

Grania Baird

Partner

Fiona Lowrie

Knowledge Lawyer

Farrer & Co

1

FSB “Policy Recommendations to Address Structural

Vulnerabilities from Asset Management Activities,”

12 January 2017.

2

FCA DP 17/1 “Illiquid Assets and Open-Ended Investment

Funds,” February 2017.

3

As set out in FCA’s Business Plan 2017/2018: see https://www.

fca.org.uk/publication/business-plans/business-plan-2017-18.

pdf, last downloaded on 27 April 2017. Link

here

.

4

As a result of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers

Directive 2011/61/EU.

5

Of these 26 funds, seven were unauthorised funds chosen

because their investors included intermediaries with

substantial exposure to underlying retail customers,

highlighting the extent to which the FCA will use its

regulatory reach to protect retail investors.

6

SEC “Adopts Rules to Modernize Information Reported by

Funds, Require Liquidity Risk Management Programs and

Permit Swing Pricing,” October 2016.

7

Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products

Key Information Document (PRIIPs KID).