Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  8 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Markets and Securities Services | Issue 46

6

Impact of the UK’s vote to leave the EU

In the UK, MiFID II looks set to stay following the

results of the referendum on EU membership on

23 June 2016. The Financial Conduct Authority

(FCA) immediately clarified its position,

stating that “firms must continue to abide

by their obligations under UK law, including

those derived from EU law and continue with

implementation plans for legislation that is still

to come into effect”.

1

As MiFID II is due to take

effect from 3 January 2018, which is expected

to be before the UK leaves the EU, the clear

message is that firms should continue with their

implementation efforts.

That said, the UK’s decision to leave the EU

(or “Brexit” as it is called) will naturally cause

some asset managers operating in the UK to

divert some of their attention away from MiFID II,

focusing their efforts on communicating with

clients to maintain investor confidence while

closely scrutinising investment performance

and risks in the wake of market uncertainty

and potential illiquidity. Asset managers,

in common with other regional and global

financial institutions, will no doubt carry

out a strategic assessment of the possible

impact of Brexit on the evolution of their

operating model, product range, client base

and distribution networks. From a regulatory

perspective, the longer-term impacts of Brexit

and what that means for the overall regulatory

framework in the UK will depend on the future

relationship that the UK ultimately negotiates

with the EU. However, firms operating in the

UK should consider the impact of Brexit within

the context of upcoming regulatory changes,

such as MiFID II and Packaged Retail and

Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs)

Regulation, to identify possible implications for

their operating models and business strategies

under the various Brexit scenarios.

Product manufacturing and distribution

The enhanced requirements under MiFID II mean

that asset managers will have to review their

product approval and monitoring processes, and

their interaction with distributors. The key areas

ASSET MANAGERS AND

MiFID II’s INVESTOR

PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS

The revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) will

introduce for EU asset managers a plethora of new requirements that will

have a fundamental impact on managers’ operating environment and

how they interact with their trading counterparties, clients, investors and

distributors. While there has been much debate on the effects of MiFID II

on the trading landscape, this article focuses on the investor protection

requirements and their potential strategic and commercial implications

for distribution models and product offerings. Asset managers will face

particular challenges when implementing the requirements of MiFID II

across areas such as product governance arrangements, costs and charges

information, reporting to clients, and applying the new inducements regime.

The new rules in these areas may affect not only compliance arrangements

and operational processes but also business models and marketing

strategies. This article sets out some of the key commercial and strategic

challenges asset managers are likely to face over the next 18 months as a

result of the forthcoming regulatory changes.